Types of Terrorism
Terrorist typologies are
descriptive classifications explaining the quality of political violence
arising from distinct political and social environments. Although many
terrorist typologies are accepted without controversy by analysts, some are the
subject of definitional debate. Accepted typologies include the following: The
New Terrorism, state terrorism, dissident terrorism, religious terrorism,
ideological terrorism, and international terrorism. Sub-classifications of
accepted typologies include nationalist terrorism, ethno-national terrorism,
and racial terrorism. In contradistinction to accepted typologies, other
classifications are conceptually “cutting-edge” and the subject of definitional
debate. These include gender-selective terrorism and criminal terrorism (often
referred to as narco-terrorism). Nevertheless, there is growing recognition
that gender-selective and criminal terrorism are features of the modern global
terrorist environment. We will identify and discuss terrorist typologies in the
modern era, including the emerging recognition of newly defined typologies.
Security experts and scholars in
the modern era have defined and described terrorism within the context of
systematic typological classifications (e.g., Barkan & Snowden; Eherenfeld,
1990; Hoffman, 2006; Lacqueur, 1999; Marsden & Schmid, 2011; Purpura, 2007;
Rubenstein, 1974; Tucker, 2000; White, 2009; Zafirovski & Rodeheaver,
2013). Typological classifications or typologies have been used across
disciplines as a means of organizations apparently related phenomena (Marsden
& Schmid, 2011). The identification of patterns and organization of things
and ideas is beneficial in many regards, a primary utility of typology “is the
greater conceptual clarity they allow” (Marsden & Schmid 2011, pp: 159).
Thus, despite the definitional debate that exists surrounding the lines of
categorization, we explore eight terrorist typologies:
The New Terrorism:
The modern terrorist environment that arose during the end of the 20th century,
culminating in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City. The
New Terrorism is characterized by the threat of mass casualty attacks from
dissident terrorist organizations, new and creative organizational
configurations, transnational religious solidarity, and redefined moral
justifications for political violence.
State Terrorism:
Terrorism “committed by governments against perceived enemies. State terrorism
can be directed externally against adversaries in the international domain or
internally against domestic enemies” (Martin, 2016: 31).
Dissident Terrorism:
Terrorism “committed by nonstate movements and groups against governments,
ethno-national groups, religious groups, and other perceived enemies” (Martin,
2016: 31).
Religious Terrorism:
“Terrorism motivated by an absolute belief that an otherworldly power has
sanctioned—and commanded—the application of terrorist violence for the greater
glory of the faith. Religious terrorism is usually conducted in defense of what
believers consider to be the one true faith” (Martin, 2016: 32).
Ideological
Terrorism: Terrorism motivated by political systems of belief (ideologies),
which champion the self-perceived inherent rights of a particular group or
interest in opposition to another group or interest. The system of belief
incorporates theoretical and philosophical justifications for violently
asserting the rights of the championed group or interest.
International
Terrorism: “Terrorism that spills over onto the world’s stage. Targets are
selected because of their value as symbols of international interests, either
within the home country or across state boundaries” (Martin, 2016: 32).
Criminal Dissident
Terrorism: This type of terrorism is solely profit-driven, and can be some
combination of profit and politics. For instance, traditional organized
criminals accrue profits to fund their criminal activity and for personal
interests, while criminal-political enterprises acquire profits to sustain
their movement (Martin, 2016: 32).
Gender-Selective
Terrorism: Terrorism directed against an enemy population’s men or women
because of their gender. Systematic violence is directed against men because of
the perceived threat posed by males as potential soldiers or sources of
opposition. Systematic violence is directed against women to destroy an enemy
group’s cultural identity or terrorize the group into submission.
Terrorism can be divided into two major
types:
1. Regional Terrorism:
Regional terrorism can be further divided into sub types
such as political terrorism, Non Political terrorism, and civil disorder.
Terrorism on the basis of culture language or race can also be considered under
this type of terrorism.
Political terrorism-
Violent criminal behavior designed primarily to generate fear in the community,
or substantial segment of it, for political purposes.
Non-Political
terrorism- Terrorism that is not aimed at political purposes but which
exhibits "conscious design to create and maintain a high degree of fear
for coercive purposes, but the end is individual or collective gain rather than
the achievement of a political objective".
Quasi-terrorism-
The activities incidental to the commission of crimes of violence that are
similar in form and method to genuine terrorism but which nevertheless lack its
essential ingredient. It is not the main purpose of the quasi-terrorists to
induce terror in the immediate victim as in the case of genuine terrorism, but
the quasi-terrorist uses the modalities and techniques of the genuine terrorist
and produces similar consequences and reaction. For example, the fleeing felon
who takes hostages is a quasi-terrorist, whose methods are similar to those of
the genuine terrorist but whose purposes are quite different.
Limited political
terrorism- Genuine political terrorism is characterized by a revolutionary
approach; limited political terrorism refers to "acts of terrorism which
are committed for ideological or political motives but which are not part of a
concerted campaign to capture control of the state".
Official or state
terrorism- "referring to nations whose rule is based upon fear and
oppression that reach similar to terrorism or such proportions". It may
also be referred to as Structural Terrorism defined broadly as terrorist acts
carried out by governments in pursuit of political objectives, often as part of
their foreign policy.
2. Religious terrorism:
Terrorist acts throughout history have been performed on
religious grounds with the goal to either spread or enforce a system of belief,
viewpoint or opinion. The validity and scope of religious terrorism is limited
to an individual's view or a group's view or interpretation of that belief
system's teachings.
According to the Global Terrorism Index by the University
of Maryland, College Park, religious extremism has overtaken national
separatism and become the main driver of terrorist attacks around the world.
Since 9/11 there has been a five-fold increase in deaths from terrorist
attacks. The majority of incidents over the past several years can be tied to
groups with a religious agenda. Before 2000, it was nationalist separatist
terrorist organizations such as the IRA and Chechen rebels who were behind the
most attacks. The number of incidents from nationalist separatist groups has
remained relatively stable in the years since while religious extremism has
grown. The prevalence of Islamist groups in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Nigeria and Syria is the main driver behind these trends.
Four of the terrorist groups that have been most active
since 2001 are Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, the Taliban and ISIS. These groups have
been most active in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria and Syria and Iraq.
80% of all deaths from terrorism occurred in one of these five countries.
Forms of Terrorism:
As well as there being no
i. Bio Terrorism
Bioterrorism is terrorism involving the intentional release
or dissemination of biological agents to cause harm to other people. These
agents are bacteria, viruses, or toxins.
Contamination of water, food, air and
packages to create infection.
ii. Cyber Terrorism
Terrorists use Information Technology, Telecommunication
and Computer System to attack civilians. The internet worms and viruses that
are designed to take down some of the systems that the government uses.
iii. Eco Terrorism
Ecosystem terrorism is a recently coined
term describing violence in the interests of environmentalism.
iv. Nuclear Terrorism
Nuclear terrorism refers to a number of
different ways nuclear materials might be exploited as a terrorist tactic such
as the use of radioactive materials through explosion.
v. Narco Terrorism
In narcoterrorism involves making, transporting and selling
illegal drugs to fund terrorist activities. Narcoterrorism has denoted violence
used by drug traffickers to influence governments or *prevent government
efforts to stop the drug trade.
Characteristics of Terrorism:
•
It is exercised by organized groups
•
It is inspired by Political Motive
•
Use of Violence is intended to arouse fright or alarm
•
There is a systematic and indiscriminate use of
violence and breach of Law

How Terrorists Operate:
•
Assaults and Murders
•
Kidnapping and Skyjackings
•
Arson and Bombing
•
Using Weapons of Mass Destruction
Difference between Terrorist and Organized
Crime Groups:
|
Terrorists |
Organized Crime |
|
Ideologically or politically
motivated |
Profit
Oriented |
|
Seek media
attention |
Do not
seek media attention |
|
Victimization is generally less discriminate |
Victimization is generally less
discriminate |
Wish to compete with governments for
legitimacy Do not do
this
Motivations of Terrorism:
As well as there being no one
agreed definition of terrorism, there is a similar lack of consensus regarding
the causes- or motivations behind terrorism. Numerous studies have identified
certain behavioral and situational characteristics that are common, and perhaps
causal, to the consequence of terrorism, specific analysis of case studies have
led to suggested motivations to individual historical acts.
A report conducted by Paul Gill,
John Horgan and Paige Deckert on behalf of The Department of security of UK
highlights the vast discrepancies between individual cases of terrorism
recorded. To begin with, 43% of lone wolf terrorism is motivated by religious
beliefs. The same report indicates that just less than a third (31.9%) has
pre-existing mental health disorders, while many more are found to have these
problems upon arrest. At least 37% lived alone at the time of their event
planning and/or execution, a further 26.1% lived with others, and no data were
available for the remaining cases. 40.2% were unemployed at the time of their
arrest or terrorist event. 19.3% subjectively experienced being disrespected by
others, while 14.3% experienced being the victim of verbal or physical assault.
i. Intimidation
Attacks on 'collaborators' are used to intimidate people
from cooperating with the state in order to undermine state control. This
strategy was used in Ireland, in Kenya, in Algeria and in Cyprus during their
independence struggles.
ii. International Attention
This strategy was used by Al-Qaeda in its attacks on the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the United States on September 11, 2001.
These attacks are also used to draw international attention to struggles that
are otherwise unreported, such as the Palestinian airplane hijackings in 1970
and the 1975 Dutch train hostage crisis.
iii. Local/internal social standing
Abraham suggests that terrorist organizations do not select
terrorism for its political effectiveness. Individual terrorists tend to be
motivated more by a desire for social solidarity with other members of their
organization than by political platforms or strategic objectives, which are
often murky and undefined.
iv. Cultural tolerance of violence
Additionally, Michael Mousseau shows possible relationships
between the type of economy within a country and ideology associated with
terrorism. Many terrorists have a history of domestic violence.
v. Perceived illegitimacy of
the State
Some terrorists like Timothy McVeigh were motivated by
revenge against a state for its actions against its citizens.
vi. Religious beliefs/zealotry
According to Paul Gill, John Horgan and Paige Deckert on
behalf of The Department of security of UK, 43% of lone wolf terrorism is
motivated by religious beliefs. The same report indicates that Just less than a
third (31.9%) have pre-existing mental health disorders, while many are found
to have these problems upon arrest. At least 37% lived alone at the time of
their event planning and/or execution, a further 26.1% lived with others, and
no data were available for the remaining cases. 40.2% were unemployed at the
time of their arrest or terrorist event. Many were chronically unemployed and
consistently struggled to hold any form of employment for a significant amount
of time. 19.3% subjectively experienced being disrespected by others, while
14.3% experienced being the victim of verbal or physical assault.
vii. Mental Health
Ariel Merari, a psychologist who has studied the
psychological profiles of suicide terrorists since 1983 through media reports
that contained biographical details, interviews with the suicides' families and
interviews with jailed would-be suicide attackers, concluded that they were
unlikely to be psychologically abnormal.
In comparison to economic theories of criminal behaviour,
Scott Atran found that suicide terrorists exhibit none of the socially
dysfunctional attributes - such as fatherless, friendless, jobless situations
or suicidal symptoms. By which he means, they do not kill themselves simply out
of hopelessness or a sense of 'having nothing to lose'.
viii. Nationalism
Although a common factor in terrorism is a strong religious
belief there are other factors such as cultural, social and political those
wholly preclude religion. For example, the drive behind these Chechen
terrorists is quite distinct and unique from others. Many of the Chechens
considered themselves secular freedom fighters, nationalist insurgents seeking
to establish an independent secular state of Chechnya. Although a distinction
should be made between national Chechen terrorists and non-Chechen fighters who
have adopted the idea from abroad. Few Chechen fighters fought for the jihads
whereas most of the non-Chechen fighters did (Janeczko, 2014).
ix. Financial support for family
Another factor is perceived assurances of financial
stability for the actor's families that they are given when they join a
terrorist organization or complete an attempt of terror. An extra grant is
provided for the families of suicide bombers.
0 Comments